56 optimizations applied
- Images — 24 changes
- JavaScript — 16 changes
- Resource hints — 11 changes
- CSS delivery — 3 changes
- Fonts — 1 change
- Rendering — 1 change
Divi builds your layout out of sections, rows and modules, and each of them brings its own styles and scripts to the browser. Of the 23 Divi sites we have audited, every one shipped scripts that block the parser and a stylesheet chain that blocks the first paint. Neither is reachable from the Divi Builder, and neither needs a rebuild to fix.
That doesn’t look like a website address. Enter a domain — for example example.com or https://example.com/page.
No signup. See your before/after PageSpeed score in about a minute.
Each one is independent and can be switched off for your domain — nothing here is all-or-nothing.
The styles your first screen needs are inlined and the rest stops blocking, so the browser can draw on the first response instead of waiting out the module sheets.
Scripts that don't build the first screen are deferred, and inline scripts sitting in the body run once the page is usable rather than in the middle of it drawing.
We read the largest above-the-fold image out of the rendered layout, including background images the markup never names, and preload it at high priority.
A long Divi page is a stack of sections the visitor has not scrolled to yet. The browser is told to skip drawing them until they approach the viewport.
JPEG and PNG become WebP on the fly, and each image's true aspect ratio goes into the markup so the layout reserves the right box instead of shifting as photos land.
Font declarations are rewritten so text stays readable while a webfont loads, and analytics, chat and embeds are deferred until the page is interactive.
An optimization you cannot undo is a risk, not a feature. Each of these is a decision you keep after the site is live on WebSpeed.
Each one is independent. If something doesn't suit your Divi theme, it can be disabled for your domain alone and everything else keeps working.
On a tuned profile we measure each optimization against your own pages and drop the ones that do not earn their place there.
Your audit page re-runs both measurements on demand, so "did it help" stays a number you can pull rather than a claim you have to take.
WebSpeed sits in front of your site, not inside it. Revert the DNS record and your original site serves again, unchanged — nothing to uninstall.
In progress: a dashboard where you flip these yourself and follow each page's scores over time. Today it is a message to us and we apply it to your domain.
Ranked by how many Divi sites had something to fix, straight from the filter logs of the audits we have run. Two of the four are unanimous, which is rare enough to be worth saying plainly.
Measured across 23 Divi audits · snapshot 2026-09-09
100%of sites
Every one of the 23 sites we audited. The builder's own runtime, jQuery, the modules you placed and whatever the last plugin added each queue a script into the page, and every one that loads without a defer stops the browser from reading the rest of your markup while it downloads.
100%of sites
Also every one. The theme stylesheet, Divi's generated module CSS and each plugin's own sheet form a chain the browser has to fetch and parse before it can paint a single pixel. On a phone that chain is most of the wait your visitor sees.
91%of sites
Divi heroes are usually a full-width section with the image set as a CSS background, so the browser only learns the image exists after the stylesheet has arrived and been applied. The largest thing on your first screen starts downloading close to last.
167fixes on 22 sites
Divi's per-module CSS splits into many small requests, and on a mobile connection the round trip costs more than the bytes do. This is our highest-volume correction on the platform.
Stored audits — the original page against the same page served through WebSpeed, on mobile and desktop. Not a demo build: these are the sites as they ship.
Real Google Lighthouse audits, original vs. WebSpeed Fast. The ring is the mobile PageSpeed after; “faster” is the Speed-Index ratio; “lighter” and CO₂ (≈0.15 g/MB per visit, Sustainable Web Design v4) come from the measured byte reduction. SEO / conversion / bounce are projections from the measured LCP improvement, not guarantees. Scores are per-page; yours will differ.
* Core Web Vitals are a Google ranking signal; the biggest lift is leaving the “Poor” zone (score < 50), scaled here by device search share.
** Akamai / SOASTA (2017): a 100 ms delay cost 7% of conversions across ~10 billion retail visits; scaled here to the measured improvement.
*** Akamai / SOASTA (2017): a two-second delay raised bounce rate by 103%; scaled to the measured improvement, site-specific.
Core Web Vitals have been a confirmed Google ranking signal since 2021. The biggest win is leaving the "Poor" band, where faster competitors get preferred.
— Google Search CentralConversion tracks load time closely — on Akamai’s retail numbers a delay of just 100 ms cost 7% of conversions. Shaving seconds is the cheapest funnel work available.
— Akamai / SOASTA, 2017Close a two-second gap and bounce rate roughly halves — Akamai measured those same two seconds raising it by 103%. A page that paints early keeps the visit a slow one loses outright.
— Akamai / SOASTA, 2017Transfer weight maps to emissions at roughly 0.15 g of CO₂ per MB. Cutting bytes is the one optimization that shows up on a sustainability report.
— Sustainable Web Design v4Each figure links to the page that publishes it. The studies measure what delay costs; read here as what speed returns. Industry benchmarks, not a guarantee for a specific site — the per-site numbers are the audits above, and yours is a free check away.
Most platform pages report shares. This one reports two absolutes, so it is worth stating the denominator first: 23 Divi sites, audited by us, on the snapshot date printed with the figures below. That is not a sample of the web, and 23 is not a large number. It is, however, unanimous.
Every one of those 23 sites shipped scripts that block the parser. Every one shipped a stylesheet chain that blocks the first paint. On plain WordPress the same two defects sit at 79% and 92% of 61 audited sites, which is high and still leaves room for a site to be built otherwise. On Divi we have not yet measured one that was.
That is a property of how the builder assembles a page — not of how carefully your site was built. Sections, rows and modules each carry their own styles and their own behaviour, and the page they compose asks the browser for all of it at once.
A Divi page arrives as a stack of full-width sections. The visual weight of the first one is usually a background image set in CSS — and that is the part that costs you. A CSS background is invisible in the markup, so the browser discovers your hero only after the stylesheet has been fetched, parsed and applied. On 91% of the sites we audited, the largest image on the first screen was being found that late.
The rest of the head is volume. Divi generates per-module styles, your child theme adds its own, plugins add theirs, and the result is a long list of small files. Small files are cheap in bytes and expensive in round trips. On a phone the round trips are the bill.
None of this is reachable from the Builder. You can remove modules, and you can switch on Divi’s performance settings, but the order in which a browser is allowed to use what it received is a property of the response, not of the page you designed.
Across 22 Divi audits with a verified before and after, the mobile score rose and the desktop score held on 64% of them. On 27% the mobile score went down. The median mobile gain was +7 points, and visible loading speed (Speed Index, how quickly the page fills in) came out 1.22× faster.
That spread is not a Divi trait. A larger study across 381 sites found that what a site gains depends far more on where it started than on what it runs: sites in the 30s and 40s gained a median of 11 points, sites already above 70 were a coin flip. If your Divi site is slow, the numbers on this page are the relevant ones. If it is already fast, the honest answer is that there is less here for you.
A slow server. We can serve a cached copy of a page quickly — but a request that takes your host two seconds to compute still takes two seconds. That is a hosting conversation, and Divi sites on shared hosting have it often.
Requests you asked for. The sites in our audit base load from a median of 12 hosts they don’t own. We defer third-party scripts so they stop competing with your layout. We do not remove them, because which pixels and widgets your business runs is not our call.
A layout that draws itself with JavaScript. A minority of Divi builds paint the first screen after load rather than in the response. Deferring anything there moves the problem instead of solving it, and we switch that optimization off for the domain rather than publish a number that means something else.
It measures your site twice — as it is now, and served through WebSpeed — on mobile and desktop, and lists every change that produced the second number. It takes a few minutes and needs only the address. If your site turns out to have little to gain, the report says that too, which was the outcome for about a quarter of the Divi sites we have measured.
No, and our logs are unusually clear on this one. Divi ships settings for dynamic CSS, deferred jQuery and disabled Google Fonts, and they help. All 23 Divi sites we audited still shipped parser-blocking scripts, and all 23 still shipped a blocking stylesheet chain. Those settings change what the builder emits; they do not change the order in which the browser is allowed to use it.
No. That advice is common and it is expensive: a rebuild means re-doing every page, and the layouts are usually the reason you chose Divi. The optimizations here are applied to the response your site already produces, so your pages, your modules and your child theme stay exactly as they are.
No. Editing happens on logged-in requests inside wp-admin, and those carry a session, are never cached and never rewritten. The optimizations apply to what an anonymous visitor receives.
Yes, and that is the main reason to run it outside the site. Nothing is installed, so there is no plugin in your list to conflict with an update and nothing to re-enable after one. The usual route is a DNS change that routes traffic through WebSpeed.
Nobody, for the audit: it needs the address and nothing else. For the switch itself, whoever controls your DNS. There is also an on-site integration if you would rather not route traffic through us, and that one does need your developer.
Probably not on the generic profile, and we would rather say so than sell you one. Across 381 audited sites, ones starting above 70 were about as likely to lose a point or two as to gain any; the ones that gained a median of 11 points started between 30 and 49. If yours is already fast, ask us for a tuned profile or spend the budget elsewhere.
The before/after check is free to run; it isn’t one of these plans. Choose a plan when you’re ready to make the speed-up permanent — or buy the report once and apply it yourself.
Subscriptions start with a 14-day free trial (Fast and Growth), then run for a minimum of 6 months — you commit only after the trial. Fast is priced by monthly visits; indicative launch pricing.
Buy the Audit once and apply it yourself — the same findings the pipeline acts on, written up as instructions.
Paste your URL for a free PageSpeed comparison on mobile and desktop. No signup, about a minute.
That doesn’t look like a website address. Enter a domain — for example example.com or https://example.com/page.
No signup. See your before/after PageSpeed score in about a minute.
Other platforms: WordPress Duda WooCommerce Wix Tilda Bitrix Squarespace