What we found across 154 Duda sites
The advice written for Duda is the advice written for every platform: compress your images,
limit your fonts, cut down on widgets. Our own numbers moved the argument somewhere else
entirely.
Duda’s CSS delivery is good. Stylesheets blocked the first paint on 9% of the 154 sites we
audited. The equivalent figure on WordPress is 84%. Whatever else is true, the platform is
not shipping you a render-blocking head, and any guide that starts there is solving a
problem your site probably doesn’t have.
What we found instead is a different bottleneck with the same effect: the page is busy
while it should be drawing. Inline scripts execute mid-render, resource hints spend
connection budget on origins that go unused, the hero image waits its turn behind assets
nobody can see yet, and background images load whether or not anyone scrolls to them.
None of that is visible in the editor, and none of it is a mistake anyone made. It is what
falls out of a template that has to work for every layout, widget and breakpoint the builder
supports — plus the widgets you added.
Why you can’t fix it from inside the builder
Duda lets you inject your own code into the page. That’s genuinely useful, and it is also
the wrong shape of tool for this job.
Adding code is not the operation that speeds a page up. The operations that matter here are
deferring, reordering and dropping things the platform already emits — and that markup
belongs to the builder. You can’t defer a script the template inlined, or remove a resource
hint you didn’t write. So the advice ends where every guide about hosted builders ends: file
a feature request, or rebuild the site somewhere you control.
A reverse proxy changes where the work happens instead. Your Duda site keeps serving the
page it always did; WebSpeed receives that page, rewrites its critical path, and hands the
result to the visitor. Nothing inside the builder changes, so there is nothing for a platform
update to undo and nothing for your team to relearn.
How many Duda sites came out ahead
By September 2026 we had a before/after we could verify on 111 Duda sites. The median mobile
gain was +7 points, and Speed Index, how quickly the page visibly fills in, came out
1.22× faster.
We count a site as a gain only when mobile goes up and desktop doesn’t lose more than two
points. By that rule 66% of the 111 came out ahead. The other side of the same number: on 28%
the mobile score went down. We publish it because an average is not a forecast, and because a
page that gains on desktop while losing on mobile isn’t a win worth selling, whatever the
average says.
What you get from the audit
It takes about a minute and needs nothing but the URL:
- Your score, both devices — mobile and desktop, original vs the WebSpeed-served page.
- The individual metrics — LCP, CLS, TBT and the rest, side by side rather than rolled
into one number.
- What actually changed — the itemised list of optimizations behind the gain.
- A before/after video of your page loading, if the gain is big enough to see.
The range above is what we saw across other people’s Duda sites, not a promise about yours.
That is the reason the check is free.